ACOSTA, A.M.; OELKE, N.D.; LIMA, M.A.D.S. Considerações Teóricas do Diálogo Deliberativo: Contribuições para prática, política e pesquisa em Enfermagem. Texto contexto – enferm. [Internet], v.26, n. 4, 2017.
ADE, N. et al. Coordination of the health policy dialogue process in Guinea: pre- and post-Ebola. BMC Health Serv Res., v.16, Suppl 4, p. 220, 2016.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa, Ed. 70, 1977. p.95 Disponível em : https://ia802902.us.archive.org/8/items/bardin-laurence-analise-de-conteudo/bardin-laurence-analise-de-conteudo.pdf
BARONE, M.; COULTER, A.; HAGGLUND, M;, BARRY, M. Empowering and engaging patients: Unlocking access to patient records and aiding decision making. Doha, Qatar: World Innovation Summit for Health, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.wish.org.qa/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/QFJ9259-06-Empowering-And-Engaging-Patients-WEB.pdf.
BOYKO, J.A. et al. Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making. Social Science and Medicine, v.75, n.11, p.1938-1945, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.016
BOYKO, J.A.; KOTHARI, A.; WATHEN, C.N. Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue. Health Res policy Syst., v.14, p.31, 2016.
BOYKO, J.A.; LAVIS, J.N.; DOBBINS, M. Deliberative dialogues as a strategy for system-level knowledge translation and exchange. Health Policy, v.9, n.4, p.122-131, 2014.
BRASIL. Presidência da República. Decreto nº 8.243, de 23 de maio de 2014. Institui a Política Nacional de Participação Social – PNPS e o Sistema Nacional de Participação Social – SNPS, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, nº 98, seção 1, Brasília, DF, p. 6, 26 maio 2014. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/ouvidorias/pt-br/ouvidorias/legislacao/decretos/decreto-8423-2014.pdf/view
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Diretriz metodológica: síntese de evidências para políticas [recurso eletrônico]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2020a. 70 p. il. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretriz_sintese_evidencias_politicas.pdf
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias e Inovação em Saúde. Participação Social na Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde para Sistemas de Saúde: Achados de Uma Síntese de Evidências Qualitativas. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde/Fiocruz, 2020b. Disponíel em: https://brasilia.fiocruz.br/aagts/participacao-social-popart/popart-produtos/
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Rede para políticas informadas por evidências: Transformando políticas por meio de evidências. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2022. Disponível em: http://brasil.evipnet.org/
CAIRNEY, P.; OLIVER, K. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, [s.l.], v. 15, n. 35, p. 1-11, 2017.
CAMPOS GWS. A mediação entre conhecimento e práticas sociais: a racionalidade da tecnologia leve, da práxis e da arte. Ciência & saúde coletiva, v.176, n.7, p.3033–3040, 2011.
CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH. About us. Montreal, 2016. Disponível em: http://www.cihr-irsc. gc.ca/e/29418.html.
CAREGNATO, R. C. A.; MUTTI, R. Pesquisa qualitativa: análise de discurso versus análise de conteúdo. Texto Contexto Enfermagem, v.15, n.4, p. 679-684, 2006.
CASTRO FTS RE. Envolvimento dos usuários de sistemas de saúde na Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde (ATS): uma revisão narrativa de estratégias internacionais. Interface, v.22, n.64, p.97–108, 2018.
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC IMPACT. A brief introduction to Evidence-informed policymaking, 2018. Available from: https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/assets/documents/CPI-A-brief-intro-to-Evidence-informed-policymaking.pdf
CHARLES C DS. Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. J Health Polit Policy Law, v.18, n.4, p.881–904, 1993.
CHATHAM HOUSE. Chatham House Rule. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/chatham-house-rule
CULYER, A.J.; LOMAS, J. Deliberative processes and evidence-informed decision-making in health care: do they work and how might we know? Evid Policy, v.2, p.357–71, 2006.
DAGNINO R. A tecnologia social e seus desafios. In: Tecnologia Social: contribuições conceituais e metodológicas. Campina Grande: EDUEPB, 2014. p. 19–34.
DAMANI, Z. et al. The use of a policy dialogue to facilitate evidence-informed policy development for improved access to care: the case of the Winnipeg Central Intake Service (WCIS). Health Res Policy Syst., v.14, n.1, p.78, 2016.
ECCLES, M.P.; MITTMAN, B.S. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implement Sci [Internet]. 2006; [cited 2017 Sep 30]; v.1, n.1, p.1-3., 2006. Available from: https:// implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1?site=implementationscience.biomedcentral.com
EVANS-AGNEW, R.A.; JOHNSON, S.; LIU, F.; BOUTAIN, D.M. Applying Critical Discourse Analysis in Health Policy Research: Case Studies in Regional, Organizational, and Global Health. Policy Polit Nurs Pract., v.17, n.3, p.136–46, 2016.
FERRAMENTAS SUPPORT para a elaboração de políticas de saúde baseadas em evidências (STP): uma coletânea de artigos publicados na revista ‘Health Research Policy and System. Disponível em: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/STP_portuguese_book.pdf
FERREIRA, C.S.; FRANCO, T.B; MERHY, E. Processo de trabalho do agente comunitário de saúde e a reestruturação produtiva. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 25, n. 4, p. 898–906, 2009.
GAUVIN, F.P. Citizen Panels program. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.mcmasterforum.org/docs/default-source/resources/23_citizen-panels.pdf?sfvrsn=da1d55d5_6
GIVEN, L.M. (ed.) The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2008. v.1.p.120.
JASANOFF, S. States of knowledge: co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge,2004.
JONES, C.M. ; MITTELMARK, M.B. The IUHPE blueprint for direct and sustained dialogue in partnership iniciatives. In: McQUEEN, D. V.; JONES,C.M.(ed). Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer, 2007. cap.3, p.33-40.
KICKBUSCH, I. Global + local = glocal public health. J Epidemiol Community Health, v.53, p.451–452, 1999.
LAVIS, J.N. Moving forward on both systematic reviews and deliberative processes. Health Policy, v.1, n.2, p.59–63, 2006.
LAVIS, J.N. et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). 14. Organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst., v.7, Suppl 1, S1-S14, 2009a.
LAVIS, J.N. et al. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst., v.7, Suppl 1, p.S13, 2009b.
LAVIS, J.N.; BOYKO, J.A.; GAUVIN, F.P. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focused on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health, v. 14, p.1287, 2014.
LOMAS, J. et al. Conceptualizing and combining evidence for health system guidance. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2005. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257946074_Conceptualizing_and_Combining_Evidence_for_Health_System_Guidance
MARTINS, P. C. De quem é o SUS? Sobre as representações sociais dos usuários do Programa Saúde da Família Saúde. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1933-1942, 2011.
MCGOWAN, C.R. et al. Community-based surveillance of infectious diseases: a systematic review of drivers of success. BMJ Global Health 2022;7:e009934. doi:10.1(. BMJ Global Health 2022;7:e009934.
McMASTER Health Forum. Citizen Panels. [Internet] Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum, 2021 [citado em 28 julho 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.mcmasterforum.org/spark-action/citizen-panels
MOAT, K.A. et al. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ., v.92, n.1, p.20-28, 2014.
MULVALE, G.; MCRAE, S.A.; MILICIC, S. Teasing apart “the tangled web” of influence of policy dialogues: lessons from a case study of dialogues about healthcare reform options for Canada. Implement Sci., v.12, n.1, p.96, 2017.
NABYONGA-OREM, J. et al. Perspectives on health policy dialogue: definition, perceived importance and coordination. BMC Health Serv Res., v.16, Suppl 4. p.218, 2016.
NCD Alliance. Meaningful Involving People Living with NCDs, 2018. Disponível em: https://ncdalliance.org/sites/default/files/resource_files/MeaningfulInvolvingPLWNCDs_Report_FINAL.pdf
NCD Alliance. Global Charter on Meaningful Involvement of People Living with NCDs, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.ourviewsourvoices.org/sites/ovov/files/2021-09/Global%20Charter_English_Final_2%20Sep.pdf
OXMAN, A.D. et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking? Health Research Policy and Systems, v.7, Suppl 1, S1, 2009. doi:10.1186/1478- 4505-7-S1-S1. Available from: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S1.pdf
PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Evidence informed policy-making. 2021. Available from: https://www.paho.org/en/knowledge-translation-and-evidence-program/evidence-informed-policy-making
PRAINSACK, B. Understanding Participation: The ‘citizen science’ of genetics. In: Prainsack Werner- Felmayer, G., Schicktanz, G B, editor. Genetics as Social Practice, 2014.
RAJAN, D. et al. Policy dialogue: What it is and how it can contribute to evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
RIDDE, V.; DAGENAIS, C. What we have learnt (so far) about deliberative dialogue for evidence-based policymaking in West Africa. BMJ Glob Health, v.2, n.4, e000432, 2017.
ROBERT, E. et al. Policy dialogue as a collaborative tool for multistakeholder health governance: a scoping study. BMJ Glob Health, 2020, v.4, Suppl 7, e002161. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002161
ROWE, G.; FREWER, L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values, v.30, n.2, p.251–90, 2005.
SOUSA, L.K. Pesquisa com análise qualitativa de dados: conhecendo a Análise Temática. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, v.71, n.2, p. 51-67, 2019.
THE SURE Collaboration. SURE Guides for Preparing and Using Evidence-Based Policy Briefs: 1. Getting started. Version 2.1 [updated November 2011]. The SURE Collaboration, 2011. Available from: https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/SURE-Guides-v2.1/Collectedfiles/sure_guides.html
TOMA, T. S. et al. Síntese de evidências para políticas de saúde. In: INSTITUTO DE SAÚDE. Avaliação de tecnologias de saúde & Políticas informadas por evidências. São Paulo: Instituto de Saúde, 2017, p.183-208.
TRAPÉ, C.A. et al. Relatório: Métodos de análise qualitativa dos diálogos de políticas de saúde: uma revisão de escopo. São Paulo, 2019, 53p.
WOOLLEY et al. Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Med Ethics, v.17, n.33, 2016.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Intention to action series: regional reflections. Analysis from informal regional consultations with people living with noncommunicable diseases and mental health conditions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 (Intention to action series). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240069749
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Evidence-informed Policy Network (EVIPNet). 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/evidence-informed-policy-network
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Nothing for us, without us. Opportunities for meaningful engagement of people living with NCDs: meeting report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021a. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/340737/9789240023321-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Voice, agency, empowerment: handbook on social participation for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021b. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/hgf/9789240027794.pdf?sfvrsn=ede874ae_7&download=true
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. EVIPNet in action: 10 years, 10 stories. Geneva: WHO, 2016a. Disponível em:https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/evipnet-in-action-10-years-10-stories
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Regional Office for Europe. Evidence-informed policy network Europe (EVIPNet Europe). Policy dialogue preparation and facilitation checklist. Copenhagen: WHO EURO, 2016b. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/323153/EVIPNET-PD-preparation-facilitation-checklist.pdf
WORTLEY, S. et al. What factors determine the choice of public engagement undertaken by health technology assessment decision-making organizations? J Health Organ Manag., v,30,n.6, p.872–890, 2016.
YIMGANG, D. et al. A scoping review of researchers’ involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. Syst Rev., v.10, n.1, p.190, 2021. doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y
YUBA et al. Challenges to decision-making processes in the national HTA agency in Brazil: operational procedures, evidence use and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst,v.16,n.40, p.1-9, 2018.
YUBA, A. L. et al. Challenges to decision-making processes in the national HTA agency in Brazil: operational procedures, evidence use and recommendations. Health Research Policy and Systems Policy Syst, v. 16, n. 40, p. 1–9, 2018.